Anthony Towns wrote: > Anyway, despite something kinda close to advocacy for the FD option in > the second call for votes on d-d-a, FD lost convincingly to most of the > options on offer. So of any conclusions you might draw, the simplest, > safest and most easily justified seems to be "stop discussing this and > release lenny"... I've heard this before and I'm not sure I understand it.
Lenny is _not_ in a releaseable state. We have enough RC bugs that it will take a while to be able to release. How's the discussion hurting the release at the moment? Unless you are suggesting that people discuss _instead of_ fixing RC bugs, to which I'm not sure I agree. Personally, I'm fine with the in depth discussion and with the voting as long as it's not a blocker for the release. That's not to say that I'm not getting tired of discussing the same thing again and again; I firmly believe that we should have one or more sane and clear GR(s), with no "for this release/time period only" options and end this matter once and for all. Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
