On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 10:54 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le Monday 15 December 2008 10:36:50 Robert Millan, vous avez écrit : > > > With these hopefully solid plans in place for the release, we feel the > > > need to acknowledge that there is an ongoing vote whose outcome could > > > potentially disrupt them. > > > > Luk is referring to 11 bugs in linux-2.6 which all have a 'patch' tag, and > > which the maintainers have been ignoring so far. Option 1 wouldn't cause > > any "disruption" to the release process, other than moving support for > > these chips to non-free when the patches are applied. Any other delay is > > self-imposed. > > Unfortunately you forgot to also mention this bug for instance: > > http://bugs.debian.org/494120
There's no reason to think that the array in question is not the preferred form for modification. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
