On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 11 d??cembre 2008 ?? 11:46 +0100, Tim Dijkstra a ??crit :
> > It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need > > to remove it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, digitaldj can > > go too IYAM. I'm not using it anymore, and certainly do not have the > > time to port it. > As this reaction is quite common, maybe I should make things more clear. > * Yes, GTK+ 1.2 is going away before the squeeze release. * > If everyone says ???I???m going to remove my pet package when it is the last > one???, it is obvious that we are never going to remove it. I don't see any conflict here - all people are saying is that they'd rather do the removal of the dependant packages when GTK+ 1.2 is actually being removed from the archive. There appears to be relatively little opposition to the idea of removing GTK+ 1.2 itself. Possibly a good way to proceed here is to just remove GTK+ 1.2 shortly after lenny is released, unless we do actually identify any critical packages that still depend on it? -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
