Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So it might well be that those SMTP servers, that accept mail regardless > of the existence of the recipient mailbox, take load off your server's > spam processing, because they eat spammer's resources.
I rather use a MTA that implements SMTP time delays to force the spammer to slow down, thank you very much. I even endorse greylisting (with a whitelist) nowadays, but you'll never see me endorsing QMail until it is patched. > Concerning the delayed delivery notifications, there's an efficient way > to immediately reject those in the SMTP connection, see I rather not force other mail admins to implement measurements to deal with another MTA's stupidity. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
