On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't understand the logical connection here. IMO, NEW processing should > > be a rubber stamp, with only the checking required to satisfy whatever our > > needs are for liability purposes.
> In my relatively short experience even the legalese check is > definitely NOT rubber stamping, considering how many NEW packages fail > licensing/copyright checks... Real licensing/copyright checks, or the ones where packages are rejected out of binary NEW for debian/copyright disagreements that have no bearing at all on the binary packages[1]? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2008/07/msg00017.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
