Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/12/2008): > That's not true. We imposed that reviewing step to ourselves, and, if > it's doing more harm (by slowing down development and annoying > contributors) than good (by detecting mistakes and improving Debian's > overall quality), we could simply decide to drop it. (or to drop it > partially, for some categories of uploads).
How do you see the legalese aspect? In the harm or good box?
> It's funny how in Debian, we always prefer to add more checks (which
> always let some things get thought while they shouldn't) rather than
^^^^^^^
through?
> trusting developers to do the right thing. It's similar to what
> happened to the NM process.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
