> ,----[ Proposal 4: Allow release managers leeway to include non-dfsg bits as
> needed ]
> | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade
> | them against each other. However during getting an release out of the
> | door, decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the
> | high quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to
> | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknowledge that there
> | is more than just one minefield our core developers and the release
> | team are working at.
> | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
> | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making
> | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary
> | authorize these decisions.
> | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1
> | majority)
Also, this one should not be voted together with the rest, since it's
an orthogonal issue. This not /exclusively/ a solution for the problem
for Lenny.
We can ask the proposer of this option what he thinks, if you don't
agree it should be split out.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Dar Williams - You Rise And Meet The Day
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
