On Nov 08, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So while I am personally of the DFSG only makes sense for executable > *software* that runs on the host CPU, previous GR's have shown that > this position has a distinct minority. So why not let the DFSG > hard-liners win this one completely? The current kernel team, if they I agree. While I have always opposed the "editorial changes" and the removal of firmwares from Debian, if the DFSG-revisionists won I can't see why the DFSG should be selectively enforced. Either we create (i.e. vote) a document defining which parts of the DFSG can be ignored for an indefinite time or the release managers and ftpmasters should apply it as usual every time a violation is reported and confirmed.
Myself, I'd like a Debian fork with RHEL kernels anyway... -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
