Am 2008-11-08 07:35:02, schrieb Robert Collins: > On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 20:01 +0000, David Given wrote: > > 2. For at least some of these devices, even if the source code was > > available it would add no value, because of legal restrictions > > governing > > which firmware blobs can be used on that hardware. > > I don't agree with this point: there may be no added value for *most > users* - but if I had the firmware source I could e.g. fix a bug to get > a region the manufacturer had not bothered to certify in to certify the > device. Or open up the power/frequency to ranges I hold a licence to > operate in.
You can not certify the software, because it is bound to the hardware.
Only the combination can be certified.
However, if you find a bug and fix it, you can send it back to the
manufacturer of the hardware/software, they can test and re-certify the
software which will be much more cheaper then the original certification
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
