Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:59:50AM +1100, Brian May a écrit : > > If we rename plink in putty (I think that is what you are asking?), that > it going to make our version of putty inconsistent with every other > putty package out there. This program is often used by scripts, they > will break too.
Hi Brian, Steffen, and everybody, while what was written above about plink in putty is also true for plink in plink, I agree that in this case it would be better to keep Putty's and changes Plink's. I had a disucssion with Upstream (that I forgot to CC to Steffen), in which he acknowledged that they unfortunately did not think about possible issues in an extended namespace when deciding for a name, as their program started as an internal project first. He proposed 'snplink' for Debian, as it nicely summarises what the tool does: linking SNPs. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
