On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:48:57AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:08 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:41:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > > > > Has the current release team lowered the bar on Debian actually > > > trying to follow the social contract? > > > > Yes, they have. > > > > Furthermore, the FTP team (which is supposed to be in charge of DFSG > > enforcement) has decided to look the other way: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497823 > > I had understood that we had passed a GR to allow--ONCE--a past release > with these bugs not fixed, with the understanding they would be fixed > the next time. Have I missed something?
Apparently, our control structures are not reliable enough to _enforce_ what we have decided. It seems we relied primarily on the release team, which has betrayed the goals of the project, and only count on the FTP team as a fallback, which so far has done nothing about it. Looks clear that we need to change something don't it? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
