On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 06:12:03PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I want to fix this, but do it right. I can see some options here:
The initiative is interesting, and exactly one of those in which distributions can help out upstreams. Still, I propose an alternative approach. What about starting by listing the options you (as you seems to have experience in this issue) think should be supported by all terminals. Then, for each implementation we have (i.e., each package providing x-terminal-emulator) we should list if they have that option and which is its semantics. Having such a list will make clear which approach is the better. My 0.02€, Cheers -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
