Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> We need to stop pretending that patent enforcement is one of our >> responsibilities > > I've not seen anyone argue that it is, nor request that we do such > enforcement.
Then you have been closing your eyes. I've already given references in this thread to where this is already happening. > [0] No, I don't have the specific patents to hand; I'm correcting what > I see as a false argument, not arguing about specific patents. please focus on the $subject, or at least indicate that you are changing the subject by doing so in the mail header. > Not only does this act expose the Debian project and, possibly, its > members to such liability, it openly encourages its recipients to > likewise expose themselves to such liability. That seems to be quite > contrary to our users's interests. Only to a minority of our users that need to do a proper legal analysis on stuff they sell anyways. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
