[Adeodato Simó] > Wow. I'm not very knowledgeable on the matter, but after looking a bit > around, I would say it is not okay to just remove that symlink.
The issue at hand is that several scripts can not provide the same facility (as in have the same string in the Provides header) without causing problems to the dependency calculations. I suspect that the correct way to fix this is to replace the symlink with a script, rename the original script or come up with some other way to provide the ups-monitor script without having duplicate init.d script provides. Note, that I have not investigated this issue, and thus am just talking generally here. :) Note also that I am not talking about package names, which is the ups-monitor name defined in <URL:http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt>. For several services providing a common service there is the virtual facilities feature, and I suspect it might be a good idea to use it here. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
