On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:33:58AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like a pretty bad idea to NFU software > that can be compiled on an architecture even if it doesn't seem that useful. > I have the X11 libraries on my NSLU2, which lacks any graphical output, but > I use it as an X11 server.
The argument for not building various packages on s390 is that s390 has *no hardware*, so anything that depends on local hardware to be useful has no purpose on s390. That doesn't apply for hpodder, which is not a hardware interface; but that's a plausible explanation for why the package was put in NFU, if the buildd maintainer thought it was hardware-dependent. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
