On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I'm not sure sure that we want to have a hole in our versioning scheme. > Since "lenny+1/2" is just another stable update, let's just number it > like a stable update. So we don't end up with users thinking "You > released 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5. Where is 5.4 ?"
Do VMware users complain about 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 6.0.3, 6.0.4, 6.5, etc? The .5 for them is a major update with some new features, but still a free upgrade while the next .0 costs money. The half update is bigger than normal revisions, so a jump in version number seems perfectly reasonable there. Of course I don't see anything wrong with the XrY style currently used either, although maybe some people find it strange. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
