ke, 2008-06-25 kello 08:47 +0100, Adam D. Barratt kirjoitti: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > The next release of checkbashisms will include a "--posix" flag which > > will allow the non-POSIX behaviours permitted by policy to be flagged. > > Currently neither set of "local" checks flags "local x, y"; I seem to > > remember there being a discussion relating to that syntax on the > > -policy list a while ago but need to check whether it reached any > > conclusions. > > Actually, ignore that. I was thinking of "local a b" which policy explicitly > says can't be relied upon.
To clarify: is "local foo=bar" policy-compliant or not? (If not, *sigh*.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
