On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:28:52PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > ma, 2008-06-16 kello 12:14 +0300, Peter Pentchev kirjoitti: > > Hm. Okay, so maybe the two command-line utilities and the collection > > might be separated. IMHO, the collection *is* still useful on its own :) > > If others share this opinion, I may either create two separate packages, > > or just remove the command-line utilities and file a wishlist bug > > against coreutils or textutils or something like that. How does that > > strike you? What do others think? > > I wish to ask this question: is packaging this collection directly > useful to Debian users? How? If the task is to remove BOMs from files, > then surely that should be served by a one-line sed or perl script (plus > manual page, copyright license file, etc, so a total cost of about 200 > KiB). > > I'm not saying that the collection should not be packaged, I'm just > finding it hard to imagine it being useful as a Debian package.
Yes, I agree with your reasoning. Okay then, so the new plan is
to package the bomstrip and bomstrip-files utilities and the manual
page, and leave developers who are interested in the various
implementations to take a look at the source package.
As to the packaging, though, I wonder. The sed and awk implementations
of bomstrip have problems with files that do not end in a newline.
Thus, I would prefer to package either the Perl or the C implementation.
The C implementation is a bit larger (ELF and stuff), but the Perl
implementation has a run-time dependency on, well, Perl :)
My personal preference would be towards the C version to avoid
the unnecessary dependency, but if people feel that 5 KB is too big
for such a utility, I'll package up the Perl version instead :)
In another message, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> Would the collection really be useful in /binary/ form, however? If
> the goal is to show how easy it is to write, installing a bunch of
> functionally identical
> /usr/bin/bomstrip.{c,ada,cplusplus,haskell,ocaml} binaries won't
> demonstrate much :)
Errr, that would have been true if the package only distributed
the compiled versions; however, the whole point of my original ITP
was to install all the implementations into /usr/share/bomstrip/source/
and only one executable as /usr/bin/bomstrip :) (and a helper tool as
/usr/bin/bomstrip-files, and manpages for both)
But, yep, as I wrote above, the plan now is to only package the tools
and the manpages.
Thanks to everyone for the comments!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
This would easier understand fewer had omitted.
pgpsRPVXgGWCT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
