On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 02:05:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 05:52:13PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote: > > I demand that Alexander E. Patrakov may or may not have written... > > > > > Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > >> That already has a problem: How to define "large"? One way, which we > > >> chose for now, is simply "everything > 50MB". > > > > > Random thought: some architecture-dependent -dbg packages are also > 50 MB > > > in size. Shouldn't they get some special treatment, too? > > > > -Zlzma? :-) > > FYI, the most recent CVS snapshots of GDB can read zlib-compressed > debug info. If someone gets around to an objcopy patch to create it, > then we can change debhelper to use it...
That would change installed size, not archive size. That'd still be interesting, though. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
