Le Sat, May 24, 2008 at 01:38:27AM +0100, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > We need the people who are doing the review and have continuously > committed to doing the review before we block on the review.
Hi all, peer-reviewed scientific research relies on intermediates to organise the reviewing process. In this system, reviewers do not need to have a continuous commitment. We could think of a similar process for Debian, in which the patch writer requests a review to either real persons or a bot, who find an appropriate reviewer and change it if he does not respond in time or declines the offer. Of course, the best reviewer should be Upstream himself. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wakō, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
