On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 01:24:13AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > You're describing a situation where upstream is difficult or impossible > > to communicate with. I can't solve that, nor can anyone except upstream. > > Except that once again, upstream that would benefit from our system > the most are those kind of upstreams, with very large sources, huge user > base, huge bugs lists, and massive amounts of patches floating around.
This does not imply that such upstreams (which I agree are those who would benefit most from the improvements being discussed) are using systems hard to communicate with. I get your word that KDE and glibc are in such a category, but we need a bit of numbers before concluding that "large packages" implies "sucky BTSs". Do you perhaps have some kind of evidence of this from bts-link? (If this is so, it wasn't clear to me from the post I'm replying to.) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
