Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 01:26:20PM +0000, Ben Finney wrote: > > What I've requested is laid out in the Debian mailing list code of > > conduct as behaviour to be expected in the absence of explicit > > requests. A Mail-Followup-To field setting may or may not count as > > an explicit request; in the absence of that, the code of conduct > > should apply. > > oh boy, are we really "fighting" over a dupe of a mail ?
Your mail message individually to me is not wanted, and I have a reasonable expectation through the mailing list code of conduct *and* through my explicit request that you not send it. Yet you continue to do so, violating both. > wasting 4k of data and two keystrokes ? You make unfounded assumptions about how I receive and handle messages in this forum. > CoC is meant to reduce rudeness Then please have it reduce your rudeness, and comply with explicit requests both from me and the ML CoC: stop sending unwanted mail messages when the messages are already sent to the list. -- \ "I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add." | `\ -- Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]