On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's probably a good plan, especially since the sandbox is apparently > going to be eliminated eventually (and it sounds like arpack and delaunay > are on the list of things likely to be merged into mainline scipy) > > <http://jarrodmillman.blogspot.com/2007/12/end-of-scipy-sandbox.html> > > I'll send the python-scipy maintainers a note and see what they think.
Is Sage really depending on the sandbox? I think it's not a good idea to depend on something that is just a sandbox. :) Anyway, as the comaintainer of python-scipy, I think there is no problem creating couple more packages for this in DPMT and removing them when python-scipy has this functionality. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
