Thanks a lot, JB. Following your hints, I am almost there. :)
And sorry for the multi-post...
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kov Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > best approach in my mind is to create two other data packages named
> > sunpinyin-le-data and sunpinyin-ge-data, and make the binary packages
> depend
> > on the data package by its endianness accordingly.
> >
> > Is this solution feasible, or is there any better way to solve this
> problem?
>
> Yes, that makes sense. At least as long as your data files are
> compatible between 32bit and 64bit hosts.
>
> (and make that -data-le and -data-be, IMHO)
>
> > And moreover, I am afraid that sunpinyin-{le,ge}-data are not
> architecture
> > neutral. So is it okay to make these two packages Arch:all?
>
> Yes.
>
> > At last, Is there any way to specify the package dependency by
> architecture?
>
> Use a substitution variable in debian/control and determine the
> correct value in debian/rules before calling dh_gencontrol.
>
> JB.
>
> --
> Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
> GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
>
--
Regards
Kov Chai
