On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I want a consistent versioning scheme, thus +nmuX for both native and > > non-natives packages. > > I'd be very unhappy about that. For one, I think using such suffix in a > field that forms part of users' everyday's life is, uhm, inappropriate > or disruptive. What do they care if the version is a NMU or not?
Hu? And +dfsg is and +b1 is also inappropriate and disruptive? I simply don't follow your reasoning here. While most users do not care about NMU vs non-NMU, I don't think they would be troubled with the extension... at least not any more than any other extension that we already use for various purposes. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
