Barry deFreese wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The newest fad in Mass bug closings is: >> All bugs against package "nurd5" have been automatically closed without >> further review, as "nurd5" has been removed from Debian. > > Where possible they are being reviewed. Of course it's possible that I > am missing some but say in the case of exim, I specifically asked the > exim4 folks about them. > > Also, would it not be the maintainers responsibility to re-assign a bug > from nurd5 to nurd6 if it was still there or no?
I assume that in _all_ [1] cases an attempt is made to contact the maintainers first? I also assume that this is only done after a package is also no longer in stable or, as long as it is supported, in oldstable? Cheers, FJP [1] Except maybe if the removal BR makes it completely clear that the package was not replaced.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
