Hi, (Please don't cc: me, I'm subscribed.)
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 01:20, Michael Biebl wrote: > Holger Levsen schrieb: > > Did you file those bugs? Is there a usertag for them? > > I tried to collect the information at http://wiki.debian.org/Rsyslog and > started filing the important bugs [1]. Only one bug is open in the usertag list, but most from the wiki are not filed yet. > The real showstopper bug, which > made rsyslog uninstallable, in the psad package, has been fixed already. > For the remaining ones (changing sysklogd | system-log-daemon -> rsyslog > | system-log-daemon), I wanted to wait until rsyslog is actually > accepted as default syslog daemon Makes sense, but also makes this goal a bit look like its stalled. > > I'm still willing to help... :) (But as its obvious now, I have lost the > > status on this..) > If the wiki page is missing information, please let me know. Looks good to me, thanks. > >>> - Document the change by preparing a patch for the release notes > >>> - Get the priorities fixed by a ftpmaster (assistant) > >> Should, I file a lenny release goal first and wait for it's approval, or > >> can I take this thread as consensus that I can pursue changing the > >> default system-log-daemon to rsyslog? > > Or was it already too late for this? > Dunno. We should bring this topic up on debian-release I think to get > more input there. If you want to kick of the discussion, please go ahead. So, hi, debian-release, what is your opinion on this? Do you think we still have the time to do this change for Lenny or is it too late already? regards, Holger > [1] > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=goal-rsyslog;[EMAIL > PROTECTED] >ebian.org
pgpiNad7zzJ40.pgp
Description: PGP signature
