On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:59:07PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Unfortunately, this is not the case. Boost is not guaranteeing ABI > compatibility across releases, i.e. from 1.34 to 1.35. So don't read > this as "major.minor" in the traditional sense. The SONAME has the > complete version in the string; i.e. "1.34", "1.35".
> So with this in mind, let me ask my question slightly differently: > Is the API change dramatic enough to warrant keeping two versions > of Boost sources in the archive? So what are the API changes? ABI change != API change. Are there significant API changes that you know of that will break rebuilds of the existing reverse-dependencies? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
