On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 02:13:32PM +0000, The Fungi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:07:48AM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote: > > I'm going to contact upstream and ask if they would consider > > releasing a new version so that this can get cleaned up.
> Wouldn't prepending an epoch be less drastic? Doesn't sound like the > mistake was upstream's... Epochs are the one thing that *don't* help. The filenames with and without an epoch are the same, and it's precisely to avoid ambiguities about file contents that you're not allowed to upload a different file under the same name. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
