Cyril Brulebois wrote: > despite the words you're trying to use to mask it, you're really > harrassing them for no valid reasons.
Actually, he is not. The mips arch (and to a certain extent the mipsel arch) is causing problems both for the gFortran transition and for the introduction of armel as a new arch which are now lenny release goals. >> In order to help the people maintaining such packages to organize >> themselves, can you publish a timeline of your works and goals for the >> MIPS infrastructure? It has been more than three months that the >> backlog is there; this is more than half the time left before the >> freeze. > > In order to keep the noise on this (these) list(s) at a suitable level, > can you please stop that? It's been more than three weeks that you're > ranting. Likewise, if you would publish a timescale for the implementation of the solutions which you keep saying are in work then a lot of people would be able to schedule their work better. All people really want to know is are you talking about a fix this month or this year? Colin -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
