Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:30:48 +0100 Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:54:20PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:04:52 -0300 > > Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > > > > As I said, for APT, the order has meaning _always_. > > > > > > apt-get install foo bar > > > > > > Is completely different of > > > > > > apt-get install bar foo > > > > Could you please elaborate on this? I know for sure that Pre-Depends exists > > just for the cases where order _does_ matter. But I've never had problems in > > installing packages in any order (or probably I've just been lucky). > > You should re-read about Pre-Depends again. It's not about the order. Could you please explain? /--- Policy 3.5 | Sometimes, a package requires another package to be installed and | configured before it can be installed. In this case, you must specify a | Pre-Depends entry for the package. \--- /--- Policy 7.2 | Pre-Depends | | This field is like Depends, except that it also forces dpkg to complete | installation of the packages named before even starting the installation of | the package which declares the pre-dependency, as follows: [..] \--- So, what did I miss? This *is* about *order*. A Pre-Depends is used to declare a dependency needed for the preinst scripts, for example. I might understand that what the OP complains about is something similar to: Depends: unrar-free | unrar obviously here the order *does* matter, since in this case the DFSG-free package would be chosen, in alphabetical order it would not. Would you please clarify what you meant? I'm kind of confused now. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
