"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In some cases, particularly when the Depends can be satisfied by
> different sets of alternatives, this change could have the effect of
> changing the packages actually pulled in by apt-get or aptitude. I will
> be happy to post a couple such examples -- one hypothetical, one real --
> if requested. (They are a bit long so I'm not including them in this
> email.)
Please, revert this change.
This is indeed a issue on APT. I'm willing to work on that on APT side
but it will take some time.
Packages order _is_ important for APT. It shouldn't be but currently
it does matter.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
