On 13/02/2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The architecture for which a DD is initially uploading a package is
> already lacking a build log on buildd.debian.org and the
> corresponding build has no guarantee to be reproducible.
>
> So if these are good arguments for not doing (massive) binary
> uploads, they are also good arguments for not allowing
> binary-uploads at all (thousands DDs making binary uploads are
> hardly worst than 1 DD doing massive binary uploads). Or, if you
> prefer, they are good arguments for throwing away the .debs uploaded
> by DDs and rebuilding them from scratch.
>
> SCNR, really.

I just made the same remark to Raphaƫl on IRC, thanks for summing it
up here.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgp2DcNLCmqq4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to