Am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 16:12:04 schrieb Mike Bird: > On Mon February 11 2008 06:53:43 Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:33:54AM -0800, Mike Bird wrote: > > > On *production* Debian systems, saving 30 seconds in a boot > > > which may occur once a year for a kernel security update is > > > not worth a single broken script, nor a single failed backup, > > > nor a single lost data bit. > > > > And what about Debian desktops, booted up once per day? What about > > home machines? > > They can achieve exactly the same speedup if Debian were to adopt > #/bin/sh.minimal and without any wanton breakage of Debian user scripts. As I've written in a previous email a switch from debian from bash -> dash won't break scripts on existing installations.
If you do there a dist-upgrade sh should still point to bash.. This switch would only affect new installation. And if there is a sysmaint who installs a new system and copy over his existing scripts without testing, ... sorry but this is a case we shouldn't care about. Just my 2c. Greetings Winnie -- .''`. Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : GNU/Linux Debian Developer `. `'` http://www.der-winnie.de http://people.skolelinux.org/~winnie `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
