On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:10:20 -0500 Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > That probably won't make much time difference on "fast" archs (i386, > > amd64 etc), but on slower ones like mips, mipsel etc (those sometimes > > hold up testing transition :(). > A missing build will only slow testing migration if the package wasn't > built when the unstable testing delay is over. Since almost all uploads > to NEW are low urgency, the build would need to take over 10 days to > affect the time to testing migration.
pokerth 0.6-1-2 needed 13 days (uploaded on 28.01, built [but not yet uploaded] today), so it *can* make a difference (not a really big one though in this case) > To speed up testing migration due > to missing builds, it would be much more efficient to work on buildd > redundancy (or other improvements to the buildd network). More/faster buildds, nicer dependencies etc, sure. But why not this one too? ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
