Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am against patch system users being forced to changed to a DVCS
> system, however, which _has_ been suggested.
I've not seen that suggested in this thread. Can you give a reference,
please?
What I've seen, that might be confused with the above, is:
* arguments against patch systems on the basis of forcing others to
use those specific tools; followed by requests;
* arguments for DVCS workflows on the basis that they provide the
advantages of tracking changes without forcing others to know the
specific tool used;
* requests from, and responses to, people wanting to know how a DVCS
workflow can do this.
--
\ "Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except |
`\ for that rare story of which you happen to have first-hand |
_o__) knowledge." —Erwin Knoll |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
