Hi, On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:11:44 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > For 12.) and 28.), I'd file a wishlist bug providing a config file > snippet for /etc/rsyslog.d/
Can we please use /etc/syslog.d/ instead? this way we don't get locked in any specific implementation. I'm preparing a patch for inetutils-syslogd to support that, and it might also make sense to require all system-log-daemon providers to support that dir as well. > And finally, if it is approved that rsyslog should be become the default > system-log-daemon, I'd file wishlist bugs against the remaining packages > to change the dependency to rsylog | system-log-daemon, where > appropriate. rsyslogd seems to have a lot of features, and it's a bit big compared to other implementations, do normal users need all that stuff? Sysadmins can easily change it, and I bet most of the users do not care much what syslogd is installed as long as it's just logging. The list of syslogd sorted by Installed-Size: Package: socklog-run Installed-Size: 148 Package: sysklogd Installed-Size: 212 Package: inetutils-syslogd Installed-Size: 216 Package: syslog-ng Installed-Size: 552 Package: rsyslog Installed-Size: 672 regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
