Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To make the dialign-t package, I removed the documentation from the > upstream tarball, that I use for a dialign-t-doc package, in the > non-free section as the their LaTeX sources are not provided. > > Now, I was informed that the reason is that the sources have been lost. > > In that case, don't the .html, .pdf and .ps files become the "preferred > form for modification"?
My opinion is yes, as explained in the copyright file for openafs-doc, and ftp-master apparently agreed sufficiently to let the package into the archive. (Although they weren't released under the GPL -- the specific license may make a difference, and I haven't checked what license dialign-t is under.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
