Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would "Emacs" and "XEmacs" qualify for this check? > > Even though "emacs" may make sense when talking about the command (while I > really wonder why one would mention a command in a package > description), checking for incorrect "EMacs" spelling would be good. > > Please note that I found no proposal to check for "vi" correct spelling.
I've added corrections for EMacs, Xemacs, and XEMacs. I'm a bit more hesitant for emacs and xemacs, for similar reasons to why I haven't added a correction for perl -- the lowercase terms have a history of being used within the communities around those applications, I think. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
