On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 07:30:30PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:51:25AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > What you want instead is one source package creating 3 binary packages. > Which is what I did...but I grokked that I was supposed to create an ITP > for each .deb, not for each source package. If that was in error, I can > close all three bugs and reopen one for libdmtx0 only. > > Is that what I should do, or is there some other way to handle it at > this point?
You can close the -dev and -utils bugs and retitle the libdmtx0 bug to "ITP: libdmtx". See http://bugs.debian.org/ for instructions on how to use the control interface to achieve this. > Okay, so you'd like to see three packages named: > > libdmtx0 > libdmtx0-dev > libdmtx0-utils > > Is that right? If so, I'd be glad to do it that way. If I've > misunderstood again, please clarify what's needed. Typically the -dev package should be just libdmtx-dev, unless you anticipate that it will be necessary to have both libdmtx0-dev and libdmtx1-dev in the archive at the same time in the future. This may be true for -utils also. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
