On mar, jan 08, 2008 at 11:32:29 +0000, martin f krafft wrote: > While working on Ikiwiki, it dawned on me that I really ought to be > using XML RPC for this [2]. Why? Because it's already > there to do exactly the kind of thing I am doing, and standardised. > Furthermore, dbus *is* XML RPC.
That's wrong, and XML-RPC *SUCKS*, as does most of the text-only interfaces, when you want real-time events. DBus isn't such a bad way to do things, it doesn't requires the daemon up and running to interact with netconf, when netconf acts as a dbus server. I assume that it's possible to write tools that directly hit your netconf server withouth going through the dbus daemon, making it lightweight and a really good solution even for small systems. And then for 0 cost, you see desktops being able to use your procedures being routed automatically through the dbus daemon acting as a proxy. At least it's what I grok reading [0]. And that's an invaluable advantage as almost all desktop applications are slowly (or not _that_ slowly actually) migrating to DBus. It means that you'll provide a tested robust known interface to people wanting to interface with you. [0] http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-tutorial.html#uses http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus#head-3aa36e8e37a29ac8985a5ae4f29a7a3d7dde231d -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpu6Nt9PRYEn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
