On 02/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Forgot to mention that, based on the binary-amd64 Packages file of the > main, contrib and non-free sections.
> I didn't check the content of the packages because that's something > linda/lintian should do Wondering why, I asked what they were supposed to catch: 20:51:10 [ KiBi] Atomo64: What are linda/lintian supposed to catch? 20:51:49 [ KiBi] That an Architecture: any package rightfully contains architecture-dependent data? 20:51:57 [ Atomo64] KiBi: !arch: all packages not containing any arch-dependent file You might have missed the point, trying again: your list contains plenty of “Architecture: any” packages that are *rightfully* “any” because they *do* contain architecture-dependant stuff (see e.g. icecc as already pointed out). > this is just a simple/quick list of packages and as I said it may > contain some false positives (although there's usually a reason/bug > causing the package to be listed). Maybe there's rather a bug in your process. Instead of speaking of “plenty of greps”, you might want to expose the code / algorithm you used. -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpHsdTBsCCaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
