On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 07:29:58AM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: >> So, right, the argument we're left with is, it's quick and it doesn't >> have many apparent security flaws. > It have NO security flaws (especially not if patching it with the most > obvious patches).
“No security flaws! And even fewer if you patch it!” /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
