On Sun, Dec 02, 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > An example would be package foobar3 build-depending on libfoo3 (>= > > 2.10.2). When built against libfoo3 2.12.0-2 which provides a symbols > > file, the resulting binaries need symbols from libfoo3 (>= 2.8.7) (as > > the symbols file say), the new system injects a dep on libfoo3 >= > > max(2.10.2, 2.8.7) == 2.10.2. > > If libfoo3 only provides shlibs and no symbol file and the shlibs > > claim a dep on libfoo3 (>= 2.10), the system would inject a dep on > > libfoo3 >= max(2.10.2, 2.10) == 2.10.2. > > So you would need to build-depend on both libfoo-dev and libfoo3?
Sorry, I meant "foobar3 build-depending on libfoo3-*dev*" (which is why I suggest we want a mapping to relate deps to build-deps); thanks for pointing out this typo. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
