On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:13:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I don't think canard means what you think it mean: all my > packages treat .ac files exactly like they treat .c files; and this > factual statement blows “canard” out of the water.
Really, so your package runs ./configure and $(MAKE) and then runs .ac files through gcc to produce .o files? > I have not had any issues with regenerating all autoconf files > during ./debian/rules configure phase. Do people have examples of > packages where this currently fails? It should fail for fakeroot, as that uses libtool features not present in unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
