Hello! On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:47:34 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > since library maintainers will soon have the possibilty to use > symbol-based dependencies (instead of shlibs) I setup a system > to keep up-to-date ready-to-use symbols files using Mole: > http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols > > You type a binary package name and you get to see whether you'll > be able to use a single symbols files for all arches like > simple libs, for example ftplib3: > http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=ftplib3
It seems it doesn't take experimental into account: http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=libthinkfinger0 http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/thinkfinger.html > In other cases, most of the architectures are in sync and some > special architectures are creating troubles. It looks like hurd-i386 > is currently causing me lots of troubles for example on pango: > http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=libpango1.0-0 > > Pango export the same set of symbols across architectures but > apparently hurd-i386 is an exception that makes my script believe > otherwise. I think asking on debian-hurd@ is worth it ;-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
