On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:03:38AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 08:44:50AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > It would be consistent with m-a's handling of build-essential. However, > > I think m-a should depend on build-essential since it always requires > > it. Therefore we are still undecided about bzip2. > > m-a don't need build-essential. It needs the compiler (nothing else like > libc headers) for the kernel. The debian linux headers already depends > against the correct compiler.
Maybe so, but "m-a prepare" installs it. I don't know why it doesn't just depend on it instead. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
