On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 22:02:41 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Hi, > > we are wondering why texlive-base and texlive-bin don't enter testing, > and I fail to understand the output of the update excuses at > > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texlive-base > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texlive-bin > > We have not (at least not that I remember...) changed any of the > versioned interdependencies of the texlive packages, so I don't > understand why the two seem to require going in at the same time at > all. And then, why are there those long lists of packages that become > uninstallable if they would enter testing? How can I find out why the > scripts think that, and find out whether there's a real issue? > testing has texlive-base 2007-10, and texlive-bin 2007-12.
Package: texlive-base Version: 2007-12 Depends: texlive-doc-base (>= 2007), texlive-base-bin (>= 2007-13), texlive-common (>= 2007) so texlive-base needs a newer texlive-bin in testing. Package: texlive-font-utils Source: texlive-bin Version: 2007-14 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.6-1), libkpathsea4 (>= 2007), texlive-base (>= 2007-11), texlive-common (>= 2007) and texlive-bin needs a newer texlive-base. Cheers, Julien
