On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:20:57AM +0000, John Kelly wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:57:23 +0200, "Miriam Ruiz" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> They're RFCs. They're not code. If you want to "modify" an RFC > >> you have to write your own and submit it, see? > >What about ... making a derivative specification out of it > You hit it. They're SPECIFICATIONS. If you want to change a spec, > you must WRITE YOUR OWN and submit it. Great, they're specifications, which anybody with a web browser can get. So there's no reason we need to be distributing them, which is fine since they don't meet the DFSG anyway. > >What about ... > You can argue hypothetical cases all day, sorry I have no time for > that. What's real is the time wasted removing whole RFCs from Debian > in a mindless pursuit of "freedom." Why squander time on trivia when > there more important things to do. Yes indeed, why *are* you squandering our time on trivia when we have more important things to do? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
