Patrick Winnertz wrote: > I add it to the svn you removed it and when i ask you why you do it, you > told me that the tarballs doesn't belong into svn. you never mention any > other place where to put the tarball. > > The only thing you mentioned were debian/rules upstream to build it, so > that everybody can build his own tarball to work on.... sorry but this > won't work. > Furthermore your tone was not very friendly but very nerved and tersely.
Note: this was done when I had some spare internet acces while vacation in Berlin. I explained that to you why I don't have time to explain it in more detail. > You told me several times that you prepared a finished package but you > simply forgot to commit your changes into the svn, and that you will > upload it debian "this night". When I remember correct you told me this 3 > times. 3 times nothing happens. Because new issues with it arrised. I though at that time to better not upload the package with those issues. History says I should have probably had. > As I mentioned above I would prefer not to post the full communication, > since this is private. (And as you know there are some things within you > won't want to see in public). for others: the parenteses refere to nda related stuff. > I told you that I don't have to explain why you shouldn't in the group, but > you have to explain why to be in it. > Then you try to threaten me with "do you really want a > schlammschlacht....? " (freely translated, sorry doesn't no a fitting > english word). i still think there is no problem with me beeing in uploaders and you beeing the maintainer. i still don't think we should 'discuss' the issue as we do right now and why there cannot be a team with a mailinglist for communication. > As reason why I do not want you to be within the maintaining group I told > you that I group maintain it with Michael and Marvin and this is more than > enough people for this package. > There were really hugh problems concerning > virtualbox which you simply do not see when uploading the package the > first time (sponsored for Philipp Hug) at debconf. Phillip Hug is a DD. He can upload packages on his own. Hence he did upload the package on his own, I did not see it before as I was busy working together with Otavio at most parts of Debconf. > Sorry?!? You'll never talked with me after the debconf upload (which was > also a very fast and dirty hack). Everytime I started after this a > communication with you I got as a answer: Sorry I have no time. Please do > not distrurb (also freely translated). Philip did the upload, not me. You did contact me one time after Debconf, when I was, as announced, on vacation (with infrequent and unstable internet access). > It's okay to have a real-life.. I also have one. But if you have one and do > not do anything the last 6 months you can state that and say: Sorry I have > atm no time for this. from your mouth, it sounds like I was MIA the last several months :)) > Please have a look on the bugs which are all assigned to you... and how > many are fixed there. You have much to many packages which you maintain > and many of them are more or less unmaintained and have several serious > bugs assigned to them. umaintained? That's an unfair and untruth claim. There is one or two packages which definitely deserved more love, both are beeing taken care of (ipac-ng and thttpd that is). > I do understand that you don't have that time to > work on virtualbox, but then you should also accept that we do not want to > add you to the Uploader field only because you would like to be a > maintainer of it. I don't want to be the maintainer of it, I want to be a, or one of several, co-maintainers. > I've looked at the svn commits... for all who also want to have a look on > it please see here: > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-virtualbox/dists/trunk/virtualbox/debian/?op=log&rev=0&sc=1&isdir=1 > > All things you do was the initial commit loong ago and then twice you > changed only the changelog. > And then after I start working in it, you revert my complete changes. That's wrong. The *only* thing I reverted is the layout change in the svn (rational for it is given in the previous mail). -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
